Connect with us
Guns Akimbo Guns Akimbo


TIFF 2019: ‘Guns Akimbo’ Is Juvenile, Vitriolic Cinema

‘Guns Akimbo’ brings violence and carnage to the real world in an over-stylized, immature effort to tackle internet culture.




Jason Lei Howden’s directorial debut, Deathgasm, was a fun splatter feature that attempted to tap into the soul of metal music while also being a bloody and funny piece of entertainment. It was most certainly bloody, and meshed with its subject matter by utilizing metal iconography and an overabundance of metal music. In that same vein, Howden’s sophomore feature, Guns Akimbo, also derives much of its stylistic choices from its core subject matter: video games. Where Deathgasm could sometimes feel like a love letter to metal fans and metal as a whole, Guns Akimbo is a juvenile, vitriolic piece of cinema that is so over-stylized that it barely resembles its inspirations, and lacks any substance to be considered entertaining.

Evoking the likes of Ready Player One and The Running Man, Guns Akimbo features an underground televised game of deathmatch called Skizm, where convicts, rapists, and murderers duke it out against each other. It’s illegal, but as with anything illegal like drugs and piracy, it’s also heavily consumed and has become a huge part of the zeitgeist. When game developer Miles (Daniel Radcliffe) trolls the people commenting and watching Skizm, he inadvertently also trolls the leader of the organization. The next morning, he wakes to discover guns bolted to each of his hands, is forced into the game, and is told that his only way to survive is to kill Nix (Samara Weaving), an unkillable legend competitor. With 50 bullets in each gun, Miles is forced into physical conflict instead of hiding behind a keyboard.

That’s it; the whole crux of the film is that a person who makes hateful comments online against despicable people is now forced to kill people. A harsh criticism of trolls? Not really, as Guns Akimbo takes its aims against a character who is described multiple times as “better” than he was before. Even Miles’ ex-girlfriend still kind of likes him, and the only reason she ever remains hesitant appears to be because he has guns as hands now.

Unfortunately, the film wants to explore the idea of internet and video game culture, but has the maturity of a 6 year-old. There are gags in here that are just shy of Uwe Boll or Friedberg and Seltzer-levels of inanity, such as a hungry Miles eating an eight-month old hot dog — which he keeps dropping on the dirty pavement next to a used condom, because he has guns for hands. Having a homeless person (Rhys Darby, who nails just half his jokes, and only because of his delivery) refuse to feed him just serves as another way for the movie to keep reminding the audience.

Guns Akimbo

Where many will find thrills or excitement is in the Guns Akimbo‘s refusal to be stationary even for a second. The camera is moving upside-down, tracking characters, and cutting so quickly that it’s amazing anyone can make out what’s happening at all. It is very clear that Howden wanted to make his own version of Crank 2: High Voltage, but he lacks any sense of rationale behind his directorial decisions. Why is the camera constantly moving upside down immediately after it does some sort of video game-like camera movements? There’s no real justification, because video games don’t move the camera upside down; in fact, they very often refuse to let players do that because things would get incomprehensible. Among the blunders of the camerawork and editing are bits of inspired action that — had they been shot well — would have been exciting. Perhaps the filmmakers should have just gone first-person, as this is essentially just a third-person Hardcore Henry.

The closest that Guns Akimbo comes to being a video game is a synth-heavy score which might as well be done by Perturbator. Video game references and iconography appear all the time, including scenes where rings pop out of Miles when he bumps into someone on the sidewalk (once again, no real purpose other than style), or characters acknowledging that they know they’re heading in the right direction because that way there are bad guys.

The shining star throughout Guns Akimbo is Samara Weaving, who genre fans will already know and adore from movies like Ready or Not or Mayhem. She’s over-the-top and silly, just like all the other characters, but sells it a whole hell of a lot better. Weaving outshines everyone in the film as Nix, with her magnetic charisma and willingness to get down and dirty with all of the blood and gore anyone wants to cover her with. Nix and Miles are the only two with any real arc, but even then, they don’t really arc so much jump to the end by completing a goal. Neither of them are particularly likable either, but Weaving at least brings enough charm to the role that her character is easier to digest.

Guns Akimbo is one of the most juvenile pieces of cinema I’ve seen, reminiscent of this year’s Polar. There will no doubt be people who start touting Howden as an auteur of genre cinema, as he does have a style that is just distinct enough for people to identify it as unique. Yet, Guns Akimbo feels more like a movie made by someone who believes that the only way to entertain someone is to strap a bomb to a character and force them to run. However, if you don’t develop the characters, then no one cares why they’re running, if they run, or what happens if they don’t run. They just know it looks really cool when they run.

The Toronto International Film Festival runs September 5 – September 15

Chris is a graduate of Communications from Simon Fraser University and resides in Toronto, Ontario. His favorite films include The Big Lebowski, The Raid 2, Alien, and The Thing. You will often find him with a drink in his hand yelling about movies.

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Feltom

    December 22, 2019 at 2:35 pm

    I had just read a quite positive review of GUNS AKIMBO and then I read Mr. Cross’ review above.
    The only way out of this dilemma is naturally to see the film myself.
    I have been intrigued by the cast with Daniel Radcliffe, Ned Dennehy and Samara Weaving as well as Mark Rowley, J.David Hinze, Natasha Liu Bordizzo and Colin Moy. If, however, character development and developing a story-line were somehow postponed and never resumed, it could turn out to be a very long evening.
    A few weeks ago, a distribution deal was announced- I’m curious enough to buy a ticket.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



‘Uncut Gems’ Sends Adam Sandler Through the Ringer

The Safdie Brothers have crafted a hectic, abrasive crime thriller that revels in its misery.



Uncut Gems

The Safdie Brothers have followed up their grimy, abrasive Good Time with a film that never quite reaches those levels of tension, but is nevertheless cut from the same cloth. With Uncut Gems, the directing duo has crafted something so loud and chaotic — led by a perfectly-cast Adam Sandler — that there is no denying it’s a fun ride, even when it is not so fun to watch. Digging through the grit of loan sharks and a dog-eat-dog world, Uncut Gems is another bonafide hit by the Safdie brothers, but one that works when it piles on the misery — which it often does, rather than find a shred of happiness.

Evading debt collectors throughout New York City, Howard (Sandler) runs a jewelry shop in the Diamond District where he sells to many high-profile celebrities. When a new opal arrives at his shop from Ethiopia, he can’t help but show it off to Boston Celtics player Kevin Garnett (who stars as himself in a fun role that never feels out-of-place), who becomes obsessed with the rock and borrows it with the hope of eventually convincing Howard to let him buy it. Of course, Howard has other plans, as the rock is allegedly worth a million dollars if sold at an auction in which he has already purchased a spot. When Garnett doesn’t return the stone, everything starts going horribly awry in Howard’s life as he juggles a failing marriage, his Jewish family ties, and keeping the loan sharks at bay.

Right out of the gate, Daniel Lopatin (Oneohtrix Point Never) hits the ground hard with a score that carries the cosmic and reverberating effects of the titular uncut gems. When Garnett stares into the opal, he sees exactly what Howard tells him he’s supposed to see: the universe. In that, Lopatin provides a sonic scape so expansive and yet violently singular in its aesthetic that it provides much of Uncut Gems with a mystical aura. Drenched in gritty camerawork that gets up close to show the blemishes of everyone, there’s no denying the film’s mean and potent intensity.

Where Uncut Gems often stumbles is in its narrative threads. While the Garnett storyline weaves in and out, providing a lot of fun as well as hectic tension, it’s a piece of stunt casting that works, while also highlighting one that very clearly doesn’t involve R&B singer The Weekend. Why he is in the movie is baffling, other than perhaps because he evokes a further sense that Howard is in a very upscale world — something we already know by his clientele, multiple properties, and the wealth he actually wears. The Weekend ends up as a weird diversion that can take viewers out of the experience, even if his presence does lead to a further escalation in problems for Howard.

That all being said, Uncut Gems also brings Adam Sandler back into the fold as an actor who can do more than the drivel he has churned out over the decades. More evocative of his performance in Punch-Drunk Love than The Meyerowitz Stories, Sandler gives a comedic and sympathetic performance to a character for whom everything suddenly goes wrong. Living a manic, fast-paced lifestyle, Howard is impatient, aggressive, and greedy, but Sandler makes it possible to get on board with his plight at least partially (there is no way to be on his side completely). His vices are many, but the performance keeps him down to Earth even when it feels like everything is flying off the hinges.

There will likely be many that can’t get past how dirty this movie feels, as it treats many criminal activities as both simply the way things are and the way they always will be. Beyond that, however, the Safdie Brothers provide a nuanced look at Jewish culture, utilizing one of Hollywood’s most prolific Jewish actors, and treat it is as matter-of-fact. Uncut Gems is a frenetic crime film from a Jewish perspective and delivers on its promise of being a wild ride with a phenomenal Sandler performance. Just don’t expect there to be much hope present, as the Safdies revel in the misery as much as humanly possible, only using hope as a torture device to make the anguish all the more painful.

Editor’s Note: This article was originally published on September 14, 2019, as part of our coverage of the Toronto International Film Festival.

Continue Reading


The Piercing ‘Marriage Story’ Is Noah Baumbach’s Best Film to Date

TIFF 2019



Marriage Story

In 2010, director Noah Baumbach began divorce proceedings with his now ex-wife, Jennifer Jason Leigh. The divorce was finalized three years later, and since then Baumbach has been in a relationship with actor and director (and occasional collaborator) Greta Gerwig. It’s impossible to view his newest film, Marriage Story, without taking into account his own dissolved marriage; this is a searching, seething work of recriminations and longing that pits two all–too–human parents against each other, and invites the audience to not only imagine which bits of psychic trauma are his own, but also to consider our own relationships, successful or not.

Marriage Story stars Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver as Nicole and Charlie, a married couple living in New York City with their young son Henry. The film opens with a montage as Nicole recites the things she most loves about her husband, from the way he can cook and doesn’t mind waking up with their son, to his skill as a theater director. In turn, Charlie narrates his favorite aspects of Nicole, his regular lead actor. There are plenty of opportunities for tears here, but the unguarded emotions of these confessions might get them started right from the beginning. But just as they finish reciting these traits, we’re brought back to reality; these confessions were things that they had written down to read to each other as a kind of peace offering at the start of their mediation following a separation that has led up to their divorce. But Nicole doesn’t like what she has written — or at least doesn’t want Charlie to hear it. And if she won’t go, then it’s not really fair for him to read his. So neither tells each other what they most admire in the other, and instead stop seeing the mediator.

It’s the first strike in Nicole and Charlie’s mutually assured destruction agreement. Though they initially plan on avoiding using lawyers, Nicole gets tipped off to a well-regarded attorney (a funny and ice-cold Laura Dern) who advises her to take a maximalist position in order to ensure she gets half of everything she wants — at the very least. Once she has a lawyer, Charlie tries out a variety of legal counsels (a soothing Alan Alda and a fiery Ray Liotta), but the real conflict comes down to location; Nicole has taken Henry to Los Angeles while she films a pilot, and wants to stay even after it’s finished. Charlie, however, thought they would move back to New York. Each escalation in the feud necessitates an opposing reaction, and the two are driven further and further apart, even as they try to stay close for the sake of their son.

Marriage Story

Baumbach has admitted that some details of the film are based on his own divorce, but he’s also said he interviewed many of his friends who divorced around the same time, as well as lawyers and judges involved in divorce cases. In some ways, Marriage Story isn’t just a portrait of a couple separating, but a primer on divorce court that far surpasses something like Kramer vs. Kramer, which was out of date even in 1979. The film is also an opportunity to observe two of the best living actors at the top of their game. Johansson and Driver have a knack for finding the sweet spot between un-actorly naturalism and the stylistic ticks that we recognize as compelling acting. It gives us a sense that these people were actually a family, and really cared for each other. Baumbach’s script helps; it’s maybe his best writing ever, filled with so many painfully open moments, yet leavened with just the right amount of humor. He’s also as fair as he could be, and neither parent comes off as too saintly or self-centered.

Marriage Story ends in a circle of sorts with the discovery of Nicole’s notes about Charlie’s best qualities. Their marriage was effectively over before the film even started, but I kept thinking back to that lovely introductory scene. How might their journey to divorce progressed if they had the courage to speak openly to each other in that one moment? Perhaps something might have been better. Marriage Story doesn’t harbor any of those romantic illusions, however; once it’s over, it’s over.

Editor’s Note: This article was originally published on September 12, 2019, as part of our coverage of the Toronto International Film Festival.

Continue Reading


‘In Fabric’ is a Mesmerizing Satire of Consumerism

TIFF 2018



Our obsession with shopping and consumerism is going to be the death of us all — at least, director Peter Strickland seems to think so. The constantly increasing Black Friday crowds and coupon-clipping masses will rue the day they bought that really nice pair of pants at such a great price. Or in the case of Strickland’s latest cocktail of absurdity and horror, a beautiful red dress. In Fabric is a phantasmagoric allegory for our growing obsession with buying into our wants, and losing our souls in the process — and it’s about as weirdly fantastic as it sounds.

Though Strickland may refute that he consciously went for evoking giallo films when making In Fabric (which he did at a Q&A that took place at the midnight screening of the Toronto International Film Festival), it’s difficult not to see the influence. While there isn’t much here in terms of plotting — a red dress makes its way to different owners, affecting their lives in different, negative ways — Strickland focuses more on illuminating the characters’ lives while they have this haunted outfit.

The only real connection between stories is the department store that sells the dress, filled with bald women wearing wigs and saying everything in as complicated and absurd of a way as possible. They move through the interior of the building using dumbwaiters, and are managed by a creepy old man who is a professional at customer service. The same model can be found throughout an in-store catalogue that showcases all the latest fashions; it’s an eerily intricate nightmare of normality. The women all essentially cast spells on their customers to get them to buy something, except the spells are just really flattering comments and exceptional customer service. Strickland strikes right at the heart of consumerism with his weird fixation on the ways we’re lulled into parting with our money.


Standing out is the way that the rich atmosphere is presented. In Fabric blends a deadly cocktail of sensuality and dread in every frame, from a red dress lighting up an entire room with its bright colors, to images of its smooth texture overlapping over morbid imagery; every moment in Strickland’s fourth feature is a delight. It’s not necessarily style over substance, but one of the many ways In Fabric falters is how indebted to its editing and visuals it becomes, especially by the second half. Berberian Sound Studio also fell into the same trappings, but where that was used for narrative purposes, In Fabric utilizes it solely for a more textured atmosphere. This lends it a strong voice, but one that drags on too long.

The question that many will wonder as the movie progresses: is this is horror or comedy? The truth is, In Fabric falls more on the comedic side of things. It’s not exactly a scary movie, but it evokes a lot of haunting imagery. Strickland has always written from a more humorous point of view, with maybe the exception being his debut film, Katalin Varga, but this marks the first film of his to just lean into the laughs. It’s absurd and preposterous, but grounded in something we can all relate to in some manner — either the customer service side of things, or being swindled into buying something we don’t need.

The appropriately campy performance from Fatma Mohamed as a saleswoman who manages to convince different people to purchase the possessed red dress is one of the greatest delights of In Fabric. On top of that are some of the weirder concepts that the film latches onto and decides to explore — like the semantics of washing machine repair. The monotonous descriptions of washing machines in disarray, and subsequently what parts and procedures are needed to fix them, offers a glimpse at how monotony can be hypnotic.


There’s an allure to everything here, as even its smallest jokes feel representative of some larger conversation about the items we purchase and the meaning (or lack thereof) that we attach to them. Peter Strickland exists within a very unique form of cinema. Here he’s at his most reverential for the medium, but also posits his most ambitious and relevant statements. There may not be more than just a simple self-awareness to the act of consumerism, but Strickland at least offers an entertaining satire of an industry we all submerge ourselves into for the smallest deal.

Editor’s Note. This article was originally published on September 17, 2018, as part of our coverage of the Toronto International Film Festival.

Continue Reading