Connect with us
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

Film

30 Years Later: ‘Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade’ is a Triumphant Return to Adventure

Advertisement

Published

on

At the time of its release, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade was exactly the film that the franchise needed, heavily relying on the past successes of era’s two most prolific creators — Steven Spielberg and George Lucas — in a triumphant return to the lighthearted excitement and adventure that were the hallmarks of the series. In classic Indiana Jones fashion, its two-hour runtime is chock full of shootouts, shlocky dialogue, chase scenes, cheap laughs, and practical effects that all work seamlessly together to create a roller coaster ride of fun. As for the plot, Last Crusade is classically Spielbergian in all the best ways, combining the speed of action with the emotion of family, while borrowing Lucas’ talent of worldbuilding to take things to the next level. Although some may argue that Raiders of the Lost Ark is the best film in the series, there is no denying that Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is an absolute joy to watch, taking punching Nazis and hunting treasure in exciting and new directions, while staying true to the classic and nostalgic formula responsible for its initial success.

In creating the story, Spielberg and Lucas sought to avoid the dark and foreboding atmosphere set by the critically mixed Temple of Doom, and instead returned to the lighthearted and accessible fun of the first film, Raiders of the Lost Ark. In doing so, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade feels like a very familiar piece in all the right ways, taking safer and more reasonable paths to close out the series (or so we thought) instead of branching out into uncharted territory. Initially, Lucas wanted the film to be a haunted house movie with Indy fighting against undead spirits, but Spielberg balked due to his recent production, Poltergeist, and the film went through several rewrites. The duo finally decided on something more appealing for mainstream cinemagoers — a family story about a search for a religious icon — and they brought back old characters and premises to ensure that the film was a hit.

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

Because of its structure, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade in many ways feels like a number of different movies crammed into one. Separated into three acts, its format fragments the plot into three different quests: the search for the father, the search for the diary, and the search for the grail itself. In doing so, the film gains a tremendous quickness that works as a revolving door for the same formulaic approach (look for the item, build suspense, discover item, action/chase sequence, and resolution) while maintaining the freshness of subject matter and scenery. To achieve this goal and keep the story moving forward, Last Crusade takes viewers all over the Indiana Jones universe, traveling between Utah, Venice, Berlin, and the Middle East with ease. This allows Lucas’ worldbuilding ability to shine, as he and screenwriter Jeffrey Boam craft new lore in these locales, while including subtle nods to past films to keep the narrative both nostalgic and novel.

In many ways, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is the most Star Wars-esque and Lucas-inspired of any in the trilogy. Marcus Brody, Indy’s university sidekick, feels very much like a 1930s C3P0 as he bumbles his way through dangerous encounters and finds himself wholly unprepared for the challenge. Williams’ theme also feels very Return of the Jedi, borrowing notes from the sci-fi soundtrack in an apparent homage. This soundtrack also backs some of the best chase scenes in the trilogy, with the airplane dogfight and motorcycle chase being very reminiscent of X-wing battles and Speeder Bike races on Endor.

In many ways, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is the most Star Wars-esque and Lukas-inspired of any in the trilogy

That being said, it’s very apparent that Lucas had a large influence over the final script, and it could be argued that the film suffers from the classic Lucas blunder of heavily explaining backstories, thereby ruining the mystique of a character. It’s a common complaint of Lucas’ later Star Wars prequel films, and Last Crusade does suffer from a less-than-stellar introductory sequence of Indiana as a kid that is used to explain the hat, the whip, the mannerisms, and the fear of snakes all within a ten-minute period of time. Like many critics noted, this does cheapen the mystery behind Indiana as a character, and deflates any possibility of a deeper and more creative story. While the quick and fast explanation does create more of a campy feeling commonly seen in ’80s era films, it is a slight misstep, and an unnecessary scene.

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

Despite this blunder, the introduction of Indy’s father and the exploration into their relationship is perhaps the greatest strength of the narrative. Although initially planned to be austere and disapproving, Connery portrays Henry Jones as comedic and fun, taking an impish-yet-serious approach to most challenges. In contrast to Indy, Dr. Jones Sr. is a bit more bookish and shrewd — although he obviously doesn’t lack in experience. For most, Connery’s portrayal is the main reason to watch this film, and his onscreen chemistry with Harrison Ford is impressive and fluid.

Although it may not be universally regarded as the best in the series, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade stands as a great film nonetheless, expanding upon the Jones mythos while sticking to a formula of action and fun that simply works. Although campy and shlocky at times, Last Crusade never makes the mistake of taking itself too seriously, and stays true to the classic formula that fans love. While the Indiana Jones franchise is still questionably expanding, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is unquestionably a treasure that has stood the test of time.

Ty is here to talk gaming and chew bubblegum, but he's all out of gum. Writer and host of the Stadia Wave Podcast, he is an Animal Crossing Fanatic, a Mario Kart legend, and a sore loser at Smash. Add him on Switch @Creepshow101, PSN/Live at Grimelife13, or Stadia at Grimelife and play!

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement

Film

Sam Mendes Creates a Rare Cinematic Experience with ‘1917’

Published

on

1917 Review

War movies have been a constant trend in cinema since the beginning of film. From black and white propaganda pieces during World War I and II to grand, ultra-realistic, modern dramas like Saving Private Ryan, war films have intrigued filmmakers and audiences alike for over 100 years. There’s a long list of films that have succeeded in recreating the horrors of fighting on the frontlines while telling a captivating story of heroism. Telling an emotionally gripping tale combined with some visually stunning filmmaking, 1917 can now be added to that list, and is nothing short of an incredible achievement.

Directed and co-written by Sam Mendes, and starring Dean-Charles Chapman and George MacKay, 1917 tells the story of two British soldiers during World War I that are given orders to personally deliver a message to a battalion off in the far distance. The message: to call off an attack that will result in the death of thousands, including one of the soldier’s brothers, should they fail to make it in time. Early on the two soldiers walk swiftly through crowded trenches; one of them, dragging behind yells, “Shouldn’t we think about this?” The other doesn’t reply. There’s no time to think about it. He carries on forward without looking back. The two had just been given orders, and time is now their worst enemy.

It’s this sense of urgency and persistence that drives 1917. Every minute is critical, and every moment feels dire. The two soldiers constantly push forward despite the overwhelming odds, as the life of thousands are in the lone hands of these two young men. The threat of failure is real, and 1917 never allows the audience to forget that.

Chapman and MacKay give wonderfully human performances as the main protagonists, Lance Corporal Blake and Lance Corporal Schofield. The audience gets to know the two men through little bits of conversation amid all the tension of getting closer to enemy lines. Their deepest and darkest secrets are never revealed, yet their actions provide reasons to care about them. The two men have their differences, but it’s clear that they want to help each other see the mission to its end. Their loyalty to one another and to the mission relentlessly drives them forward, and ultimately makes it easy for the audience to hope these characters succeed.

What really sets 1917 apart from other war epics is the masterful directing by Sam Mendes. The film creates the illusion throughout that the audience is watching a single continuous shot. From the first shot until the last, the focus never strays from its protagonists, allowing the audience to experience every step as it’s taken. Aside from the characters moving into a dark trench or behind a tall structure, it can be really tough to tell just how long each take is; where the director says “action” and “cut” is blurred to a point of fascination here, and though audiences have seen prolonged shots of war in past films, this is on another level. Combined with some brilliant pacing and jaw-dropping action sequences, 1917 never loses grip of its audience, as everything is seen without pause.

It’s also worth noting that every shot is elevated by a phenomenal score by Thomas Newman (who has worked with Mendes before on Skyfall). It seems that the goal here was not only to increase the intensity and drama of each scene, but also to allow the audience to feel exactly what the characters are feeling at all times. Whether the soldiers are walking through crowded trenches, cautiously cornering buildings, or taking a brief moment to catch their breath, every bit of what they’re feeling and just how their fast their hearts are pumping is translated. The music always feels natural, even in its most dramatic moments, and it deserves high praise for complimenting Mendes’ story so well.

1917 is one of the most unique movie-going experiences in recent memory. It takes the war movie genre and does something no one has ever seen before, which is extremely difficult with so many memorable war films in cinematic history. With 1917 Sam Mendes has created an unforgettable experience that needs to be seen on the biggest screen, and it deserves to be ranked among the greatest war films of all time.

Continue Reading

Film

With ‘Road to Perdition,’ Sam Mendes showed another side of Tom Hanks

Published

on

In his long, distinguished career, one thing Tom Hanks hasn’t done a lot of on screen is dispassionately shoot people. Sure, in Bonfire of the Vanities he hit a kid with his car, and in Cloud Atlas he threw someone off the roof of the building. And yes, he played a soldier in both Saving Private Ryan and the Vietnam part of Forrest Gump, and there was a third-act gunfight in his 1989 cop/dog comedy Turner & Hooch. But the one and only time Hanks has played a full-on murderer was in Road to Perdition, director Sam Mendes’ 2002 meditation on fathers, sons, crime, and the legacies of violence.

Naturally, Hanks being Hanks, Mendes’ film positions his Michael Sullivan not as an irredeemable monster, but rather a humanized character who may not be beyond redemption (the film’s poster tagline was “Pray for Michael Sullivan.”) 

Set in the 1930s and adapted from a first-rate screenplay by David Self, Road to Perdition tells the story of Sullivan, a mob enforcer in Rock Island, Ill., who works for local crime boss Rooney (Paul Newman), the man who raised him. Frequently dispatched to bump off Rooney’s rivals, Michael is committed to not allow his young son, Michael Jr. (future Arrowverse actor Tyler Hoechlin), to go down the same path in life he did. 

Road to Perdition

When the young Michael witnesses his father committing a murder, it leads to a chain of tragic events that has the two Michaels on the road to Chicago to make a deal with Al Capone’s crew (in the person of his henchman, played in one scene by Stanley Tucci), and eventually on the run from a rival hitman (Jude Law.) Meanwhile, Rooney’s jealous son, Connor (a pre-Bond Daniel Craig), schemes against him. 

Road to Perdition attaches a violent crime plot to considerations of sin and specific references to Catholicism, which is something that directors from Martin Scorsese to Abel Ferrera have done for decades. But Mendes’ film finds a new way to tell that particular story by focusing it on the gangster’s young son. 

Road to Perdition, which came out in the summer of 2003, was Mendes’ second film, and his first after 1999’s Best Picture-winning American Beauty. It’s the better film, thanks to a strong script and the work of a great cast, but more than that, it’s absolutely visually stunning in a counter-intuitive 1:33 to 1 aspect ratio. The film’s final sequences, of both the rain-drenched gunfight and the denouement on the beach, are among the most beautiful cinema of the 2000s. 

The film won the Best Cinematography Oscar for Conrad L. Hall, the third of his career, although sadly Hall passed away before the Oscar was awarded; it was accepted on his behalf by his son, Conrad W. Hall.  Hall’s Oscar was the only one the film won after it was nominated for six, although not including Best Picture or Best Actor. 

Road to Perdition came at the front end of Hanks’ nearly 20-year Oscar nomination drought, between Cast Away and this year’s Won’t You Be My Neighbor. But Road to Perdition is an underrated Hanks performance. Even beyond all the murder, it’s very understated, and much more strong/silent than is typical of Hanks’ work. He also wears a hat most of the time, which Hanks doesn’t often do. 

Road to Perdition

Paul Newman was nominated for Best Supporting Actor for what would be his final on-screen role, although his voice continued to be used in Pixar’s Cars movies, even after his death. As for Daniel Craig as Connor, he’s playing a character who in today’s parlance would be called a “failson,” and it’s a role that he undoubtedly has been too big a star for just a few years later. 

Sam Mendes has had something of an uneven career. His first film, American Beauty, won Best Picture, but its reputation has somewhat suffered over time for reasons fair and unfair. He’s directed great James Bond movies (Skyfall), and not-so-great ones (Spectre.) He’s made small films that were decent (Away We Go) and big ones that were disastrous (Revolutionary Road). But while he’s getting some of his best attention for 1917, which has emerged as an Oscar frontrunner, Road to Perdition stands as his most complete and satisfying work. 

Continue Reading

Festival du Nouveau Cinema

‘Color Out of Space’ is Pure Cosmic Horror

Festival de Nouveau Cinema 2019

Published

on

Color Out of Space Review

Color Out of Space stands out as one the best direct adaptations of Lovecraft’s work.

Even before a meteor streaks out of the sky, Richard Stanley’s Color Out of Space firmly establishes an atmosphere of alien, otherworldly dread. Opening on a fog-shrouded forest dripping with foreboding atmosphere, Stanley evokes the spirit of the controversial author in a way few filmmakers have, and the use of direct quotes from the short story further cements this as a love-letter to Lovecraft and his work. But Color isn’t just a slavish ode to the influential writer and his cosmic horror creations; the South African director also injects just enough of himself into the film to create something that builds upon the core of Lovecraft’s story, maintaining that kernel of pulp horror while introducing elements that feel wholly personal to the filmmaker. For this and many other reasons, Color Out of Space stands out as one the best direct adaptations of Lovecraft’s work, and one of the most engrossing genre movies this year.

The film by and large maintains the narrative core of the original, recombining elements to suit the change in medium, but staying quite faithful otherwise. Nic Cage stars as Nathan Gardner, who has moved his wife and two children to a secluded country home to get away from urban life. The Gardner family’s pastoral bliss is interrupted by a meteor that strikes their farm in the dead of night, and both their home and their very bodies begin to change soon after.

Color Out of Space

Unsurprisingly for a film with the hands of Lovecraft, Stanley, and Cage on the wheel, Color is often quite a strange experience, rife with disparate influences and odd touches. Nathan’s daughter, Lavinia, is a practicing witch, which is a story element that could only have come from Stanley, a magician himself. The Gardner family are also trying their hand at Alpaca farming — a bewildering plot element that feels like it could have been one of Cage’s notoriously eccentric fancies, right down to the brief lesson in Alpaca milking. Of course, Lovecraft’s passion for unknowable cosmic terrors is draped over all of this. There’s a wonderful atmosphere of dread and the unknown, about as pure an expression of Lovecraft as one could hope for in a contemporary setting. You’d think it would all make for a disjointed mishmash, but it all gels quite nicely, with the quirky family coming off as endearing more often than not. 

Color Out of Space is one of the most engrossing genre movies this year.

There are a few distracting, odd moments, like Lavinia’s turn to self-scarring in a desperate ritual to avert disaster. It largely isn’t commented on, and her sudden appearance with arcane runes carved into her flesh doesn’t end up feeling like the important story or character beat it probably should have. Likewise, Cage’s performance is on the eccentric side, with odd mannerisms and a truly strange accent taking over as the Gardner patriarch begins to go off the deep end. But then, that’s half the fun when it’s Cage we’re talking about.

Color Out of Space

Like so much of Lovecraft’s work, Color Out of Space deals with the intrusion of the unknowable and alien into the mundane waking world. While other works have had this manifest in the form of eldritch space gods or croaking fish-people, Color instead uses an alien environment as the intruder. While Stanley clearly isn’t working with a massive budget, this idea is still used to create some stunning environments as the Gardner farm’s transformation progresses, with the climax offering some of the most engaging visuals in recent memory. There’s also some truly unsettling body horror, more gruesome and explicit than anything from the story, but an organic fit for the material. Color Out of Space is Stanley’s first feature-length fiction film in around fifteen years, and by all indications, he hasn’t lost his edge. For both fans of Lovecraft and the director’s own works, there’s much to see and love here. The visuals are breathtaking, the atmosphere sumptuous, and it’s Lovecraft to the core with just enough original madness thrown in.

Editor’s Note: This article was originally published on October 14, 2019, as part of our coverage of the Festival du Nouveau Cinema.

Color Out of Space Review
Continue Reading

Popular